The Online University of France has established a Quality Assurance (QA) structure to provide a comprehensive approach to maintaining the quality and integrity of its educational offerings. This structure supports the institution’s mission and objectives and ensures a positive impact on students and the broader community. The QA structure encompasses the following elements:

1. Licenses & Authority:
   Details the legal and official authorizations that allow the institution to operate and offer educational programs.

2. Nature of the Online University of France Programs:
   Describes the characteristics, goals, and delivery methods of the programs offered by the Online University of France.

3. Accreditation & Recognition:
   Information on the institution's accreditation status and recognition by reputable educational and professional organizations.

4. Governance Structure (GS):
   Describes the organizational structure, including boards, committees, and administrative roles responsible for decision-making and oversight.

5. Position Description (PD):
   Outlines the roles, responsibilities, qualifications, and expectations for positions within the institution.

6. Lecturer and Staff Curriculum Vitae (CV):
   Compiles the qualifications, experience, and achievements of faculty and staff to support the institution’s commitment to high-quality education.

7. Main Regulatory Documents (MR):
   Key documents that regulate the institution's operations, including laws, standards, guidelines, and policies.

8. QA Review and Continual Improvement (CI):
   Describes the processes for regular quality assessments and the mechanisms for implementing improvements based on feedback and evaluations.

9. QA Review and Continual Improvement Form (CIF):
   A document or tool used to record QA reviews and track improvement actions and outcomes.

10. Academic Partnership (AP):
    Information about collaborations with other educational institutions, organizations, and industry partners to enhance educational offerings and opportunities for students.

11. Programme Specifications (PS):
    Detailed descriptions of each program, including curriculum, learning outcomes, assessment methods, and qualifications awarded.

12. Health and Safety Policy (HS):
    Policies and procedures to ensure the health and safety of all members of the institution, including compliance with relevant laws and regulations.

13. Student Policy (SS):
    Policies related to student rights, responsibilities, conduct, and support services, ensuring a conducive learning environment.

This QA structure reflects the Online University of France’s commitment to upholding the highest standards in education, fostering continual improvement, and ensuring the well-being of all its stakeholders.

This component forms a critical foundation of the Online University of France’s operational legitimacy and credibility. It encompasses all necessary legal and official authorizations, permits, and accreditations required for the institution to function legally and offer its educational programs. These authorizations are typically obtained from relevant educational oversight bodies, government departments, and professional accreditation organizations.

The process of acquiring and maintaining these licenses and authorities involves rigorous application procedures, adherence to specific educational standards, and compliance with local and national regulations. This ensures that the institution meets the highest standards of educational quality, safety, and ethical practices. For an institution like the Online University of France, these authorizations validate the commitment to providing recognized and respected degrees, diplomas, and other educational credentials.

Furthermore, these legal and official authorizations serve as a trust signal to prospective students, faculty, and partners, indicating that the institution operates within the legal framework and adheres to the quality standards set by the educational community and government agencies. They also enable the institution to participate in public funding programs, student financial aid programs, and international educational exchanges, enhancing its ability to attract a diverse student body and offer competitive programs.

Regular audits, reviews, and renewals of these authorizations ensure ongoing compliance and alignment with evolving educational standards and regulations. This continuous process demonstrates the institution’s dedication to excellence, accountability, and improvement—essential elements for maintaining its status and authority to operate within the dynamic landscape of higher education.

The Online University of France operates as a division of, and under the direct oversight of, Université Libérale de Paris (Paris-U). It functions under the license granted to Université Libérale de Paris and operates as a DBA (doing business as) entity. The Online University of France is not an independent university and does not have separate university status.

Accordingly, the Online University of France does not confer qualifications in its own name. The awarding body for all qualifications is Université Libérale de Paris (Paris-U) and/or university partners.

Degrees issued by Université Libérale de Paris are distinct from qualifications awarded under the French National Curriculum and do not lead to degrees accredited by the French Government. Such government-accredited degrees fall within the French Public/Federal Higher Education sector. All qualifications from Université Libérale de Paris are solely issued by Paris-U and are not supported, endorsed, or affiliated with the French government.

Upon completing the required learning content and fulfilling all obligations, including adherence to academic discipline and integrity, students may be awarded a Private Degreefrom Université Libérale de Paris (where applicable). In cases of dual qualifications or programs conducted in partnership with other institutions, students may also receive an additional qualification or confirmation from the respective partner institution. For more information, please refer to the Disclaimer section.

Recognition of qualifications varies widely by country, institution, and region, as each has its own regulatory framework. According to international standards, the recognition or acceptance of qualifications is a discretionary decision of the receiving agency, government, or regional policy. This process is beyond the involvement or support of Université Libérale de Paris and the Online University of France, and thus the institutions explicitly disclaim any responsibility in this matter.

Candidates are strongly advised to thoroughly investigate the recognition and acceptance of their post-graduation qualifications before enrolling. As previously emphasized, Université Libérale de Paris, the Online University of France, and their partners (including partner universities and scientific collaborators) do not make any commitments or promises regarding the recognition of qualifications. The institutions fully reserve the right to waive this responsibility before, during, and after the student’s graduation.

The Governance Structure (GS) of the Online University of France serves as the backbone of the institution, providing a framework for effective decision-making, strategic planning, and organizational oversight. At its core, the GS outlines the organizational hierarchy, defining the roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders, including boards, committees, and administrative personnel.

1. BOARDS:
   The governance structure typically includes one or more governing boards, such as a Board of Trustees or Board of Directors, responsible for setting the institution’s overall strategic direction, policies, and goals. These boards consist of distinguished individuals with expertise in various fields, who provide guidance and oversight to ensure the institution’s long-term success.

2. COMMITTEES:
   Within the governance structure, various committees may be established to address specific areas of concern or expertise. These committees, such as academic affairs, finance, and student affairs committees, play a vital role in advising the governing boards and senior management on key issues and initiatives within their respective domains.

3. ADMINISTRATIVE ROLES:
   The governance structure also delineates the roles and responsibilities of administrative personnel, including senior executives, deans, department heads, and other key leaders. These individuals are responsible for implementing the institution’s policies and strategic priorities, managing day-to-day operations, and fostering a culture of excellence and accountability within their respective areas of responsibility.

By clearly defining the governance structure, the Online University of France ensures transparency, accountability, and effective communication throughout the organization. This structure facilitates collaboration and synergy among different stakeholders, enabling the institution to adapt to changing circumstances, navigate challenges, and seize opportunities for growth and innovation.

Moreover, the governance structure reflects the Online University of France’s commitment to upholding the highest standards of ethical conduct, integrity, and institutional integrity. By adhering to best practices in governance, the institution demonstrates its dedication to serving the best interests of its students, faculty, staff, and the broader community, while maintaining the trust and confidence of its stakeholders.

Details of the Governance Structure are provided comprehensively in the GS documents.

The Position Description (PD) documents serve as comprehensive guides outlining the roles, responsibilities, qualifications, and expectations associated with various positions within the Online University of France. These documents are meticulously crafted to provide clear and transparent guidelines for both current employees and prospective candidates, ensuring alignment with the institution’s goals and values.

Within the Position Description documents, each role is meticulously outlined, including:

1. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
   A detailed breakdown of the duties, tasks, and functions associated with the position. This section clarifies the specific contributions expected from individuals occupying the role, ensuring clarity and accountability in their day-to-day activities.

2. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE:
   Clear specifications regarding the educational background, professional qualifications, and relevant experience required for the role. This ensures that candidates possess the necessary knowledge and skills to perform effectively in their positions.

3. EXPECTATIONS AND PERFORMANCE METRICS:
   Defined expectations and performance metrics against which individuals in the role will be evaluated. This section provides a framework for assessing job performance and identifying areas for growth and development.

4. REPORTING STRUCTURE AND RELATIONSHIPS:
   Information on reporting lines, internal and external relationships, and collaboration requirements. This helps individuals understand their place within the organizational hierarchy and fosters effective communication and teamwork.

5. CAREER DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES:
   Insight into potential career paths, growth opportunities, and professional development resources available to individuals in the role. This demonstrates the Online University of France’s commitment to supporting employee growth and advancement.

By providing detailed Position Description documents, the Online University of France ensures that all employees have a clear understanding of their roles and responsibilities within the institution. This clarity promotes organizational effectiveness, employee satisfaction, and overall success, contributing to the university’s reputation as a premier educational institution committed to excellence in all aspects of its operations.

All positions within the Online University of France are described in detail within the PD bundle of documents.

The compilation of Lecturer and Staff Curriculum Vitae (CV) at the Online University of France serves as a testament to the wealth of expertise, experience, and accomplishments that faculty and staff bring to the institution. These CVs encapsulate the professional journeys of individuals, showcasing their qualifications, academic credentials, work experience, and notable achievements in their respective fields.

At the Online University of France, the meticulous curation of CVs reflects the institution's unwavering commitment to maintaining a team of highly qualified and dedicated professionals who are at the forefront of their disciplines. Each CV provides insights into the diverse backgrounds and areas of specialization represented among the faculty and staff, enriching the educational experience for students and fostering a culture of academic excellence.

By compiling and reviewing Lecturer and Staff CVs, the Online University of France ensures that its academic community comprises individuals who not only possess the requisite knowledge and expertise but also demonstrate a passion for teaching, research, and scholarly inquiry. These CVs serve as valuable resources for prospective students, enabling them to make informed decisions about their educational journey and providing assurance of the caliber of instruction they can expect.

Moreover, the compilation of CVs underscores the Online University of France’s commitment to transparency and accountability in its recruitment and hiring practices. By providing a comprehensive overview of the qualifications and achievements of faculty and staff, the institution demonstrates its dedication to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity and fostering an environment conducive to learning and intellectual growth.

Ultimately, the compilation of Lecturer and Staff CVs represents more than just a list of credentials; it is a reflection of the institution's dedication to cultivating a vibrant academic community characterized by expertise, innovation, and a shared commitment to advancing knowledge and shaping future leaders in their respective fields.

Each staff member's CV is aligned with the requirements of the position, as outlined in the Position Description (PD)documents.

The Main Regulations at the Online University of France outline the framework for the development, delivery, and assessment of programs leading to awards by the institution and its partners. These regulations encompass general principles, quality assurance, program structure, student information, admissions, program delivery, assessment regulations, progression, failure, referral mechanisms, and the conferment of awards. They ensure that programs meet quality standards and provide clear guidelines for program validation, student recruitment, assessment design, and the roles of internal and external examiners. The regulations also address provisions for students with special educational needs, program validation and approval, academic governance, monitoring, and review.

The Main Regulatory Documents (MR) of the Online University of France consist of four key documents:

1. MR1 - Regulatory Framework:
   Establishes the regulatory principles and guidelines governing taught programs of study leading to awards, outlining general principles, procedures, and regulations to ensure compliance and quality assurance in educational offerings.

2. MR2 - Validation Handbook:
   Provides comprehensive guidelines for the validation and approval processes of new and modified academic programs, ensuring the quality and relevance of courses offered in alignment with the Online University of France’s standards and those of external awarding bodies.

3. MR3 - Student Academic Handbook:
   Serves as a guide for full-time and hybrid learning students, detailing the academic policies, procedures, and support mechanisms in place to facilitate their learning journey and success in their studies.

4. MR4 - Cookies Policy:
   Informs website users about the use of cookies, detailing how cookies are used to improve the user experience, the types of cookies deployed, and users' options regarding cookie acceptance and privacy.

These Main Regulatory Documents represent the commitment of the Online University of France to uphold the highest standards of quality and transparency in all its operations, ensuring that students, faculty, and partners can confidently engage with the institution’s programs and services.

The overall intent of the documents related to Quality Assurance (QA) review and Continuous Improvement (CI) at the Online University of France is to establish a robust framework for maintaining and enhancing the quality of academic programs, assessments, and institutional processes. This framework involves systematic policies and procedures for internal moderation, validation, and program modifications, aimed at ensuring academic standards and improving student learning experiences.

1. Policy on Internal Moderation:
   Establishes guidelines for internal moderation to ensure consistency and fairness in assessment marking.

2. Sampling Basis for Moderation:
   Outlines the criteria for selecting assessments for internal moderation to ensure a representative and fair review process.

3. Internal Verification Policy:
   Details the procedures and responsibilities for internal verification of assessments within awards offered by the Online University of France. The policy ensures that all assessments are created and marked accurately, fairly, and consistently in line with module specifications and assessment criteria. It aims to maintain standards set by the awarding body through regular and systematic reviews of assessment activities and decisions.

4. Procedure for Minor Modifications to Existing Programs:
   Describes the process for proposing, approving, and implementing minor modifications to existing academic programs. The intent is to ensure that changes maintain or enhance academic standards and the quality of the student learning experience, with clear guidelines for documentation, approval processes, and administrative tasks following approval.

5. Annual Monitoring and Review Proforma:
   Designed for annual monitoring and review, covering key areas such as student progression, curriculum, learning and teaching, assessment, student support, and learning resources. This document aims to collect comprehensive data and feedback from various stakeholders, including students, staff, and external examiners, to evaluate the effectiveness of programs and identify areas for improvement.

These documents collectively form a comprehensive framework for Quality Assurance (QA) and Continuous Improvement (CI) within the Online University of France, focusing on maintaining high academic standards, ensuring the relevance and quality of programs, and enhancing the overall student experience.

The overall intent of the Continuous Improvement Forms (CIF) documents at the Online University of France is to provide a structured framework for initiating, documenting, and tracking various aspects of quality assurance and continuous improvement processes. These documents collectively facilitate the planning, implementation, and review of actions aimed at enhancing the quality of educational programs, courses, and institutional practices. Each form is tailored to address specific areas such as action planning, course proposals, feedback collection, course amendments, course closures, internal assessment approvals, validation planning, external examiner reporting, and admissions auditing. This comprehensive suite of documents ensures systematic engagement with continuous improvement activities, aiming to uphold and enhance the academic standards and student learning experience.

Key CIF Documents:

1. CIF1 Action Plan Form:
   Designed for documenting actions in response to corrective action requests. It tracks progress and plans new actions to address specific issues or implement improvements, detailing ongoing and planned actions, responsible parties, and deadlines.

2. CIF2 New Course Proposal Form:
   Enables faculty or department members to propose new courses. It requires detailed information, including rationale, delivery mode, partner bodies, and market analysis to justify the course’s demand and alignment with institutional goals.

3. CIF3 Module Feedback Questionnaire:
   Gathers student feedback on module content, teaching, support, and assessment. This feedback helps identify strengths and opportunities for improvement to foster a student-centered approach to teaching enhancement.

4. CIF4 Course Amendment Form:
   Used for proposing major changes to existing courses, requiring a rationale for changes, analysis of risks, impact on current students, and transitional arrangements. This ensures thorough consideration and documentation of course modifications.

5. CIF5 Course Closure Form:
   Documents and proposes the closure of courses, capturing reasons for closure, impact on students, exit arrangements, and financial analysis. This form ensures all factors are considered and documented for course closure decisions.

6. CIF6 Internal Assessment Approval Form:
   A checklist designed to ensure internal assessments meet quality criteria before being administered, addressing all learning outcomes, providing clear guidance, and maintaining consistency and integrity in assessments.

7. CIF7 Validation Planning Form:
   Facilitates planning and documentation required for the validation or re-approval of programs, ensuring adherence to academic regulations and alignment with external body awards and accreditations.

8. CIF8 External Examiner Quarterly Report Form:
   Provides a structured format for external examiners to report on academic standards, assessment procedures, and student achievement, offering an external perspective on program quality and integrity.

9. CIF9 Admissions Audit Template:
   Designed for auditing the admissions process, capturing detailed information on admissions, compliance with standards, and feedback, and including action plans to address any concerns.

These documents collectively form a comprehensive framework for continuous improvement at the Online University of France, focusing on maintaining high academic standards, ensuring the relevance and quality of programs, and enhancing the overall student experience.

The process from admission to graduation for students at the Online University of France involves several key stages, ensuring a comprehensive and quality-assured educational journey. This journey begins with an admissions audit to ensure compliance with entry standards and continues through coursework guided by internal assessments and external examinations to uphold academic integrity. Feedback mechanisms, such as module feedback questionnaires, contribute to continuous improvement, and course amendments may be made to enhance the learning experience. Program validation planning and external reviews are implemented to guarantee quality. The process concludes with graduation, where students have met all academic requirements and benefited from a quality-assured educational process.

KEY PROCEDURES:

1. INFORMATION GIVEN TO STUDENTS – QA INFO CODE:
   This procedure aims to ensure that students receive accurate and comprehensive information throughout their educational journey. It covers every stage from admissions audits that verify student qualifications, through detailed program validation, feedback mechanisms, and systematic assessments, to external examinations and audits. The goal is to support students’ academic success and personal development within a framework of continuous improvement, culminating in graduation.

2. RECRUITMENT AND ENROLLMENT OF STUDENTS – QA RECRUIT CODE:
   This document outlines the principles, policies, and procedures that govern the recruitment and enrollment of students. It includes transparent, fair, and consistent admissions processes, the recognition of prior learning, and clear terms and conditions for enrolled students. It also addresses the admission of students with criminal convictions, ensuring safety and legal compliance, and providing equal opportunities for education while maintaining community trust and security.

3. PROGRAM DELIVERY – QA DELIVERY CODE:
   This set of documents is designed to ensure the highest standards in program delivery and research at the Online University of France. It covers student progress monitoring, recruiting qualified tutors, ongoing academic staff development, providing clear guidance for face-to-face and online tutoring, implementing effective learning and assessment strategies, and regularly reviewing academic staff performance. These guidelines collectively enhance the quality of teaching, learning, and assessment.

4. ASSESSMENT – QA ASSESSMENT CODE:
   These documents aim to ensure integrity, fairness, and high standards in student assessments. They include clear disciplinary procedures, examination regulations, criteria for approving examination centers, policies for mitigating exceptional circumstances, guidelines to prevent unfair practices, policies for moderators, and the selection and nomination process for external examiners. Together, they uphold the quality and credibility of assessments, ensuring that student evaluations are conducted ethically and consistently.

5. EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY POLICY – QA PROGRESS1:
   This policy outlines the Online University of France’s commitment to promoting equality and diversity within its community. It sets forth principles to prevent discrimination, promote inclusive practices, and create an environment where diversity is recognized and opportunities are accessible to all. The policy aims to foster an inclusive culture that values diversity across all operations of the institution.

This structured approach ensures that the Online University of France upholds the highest standards in education, supports student success, and maintains a fair and inclusive environment.

The overall intent of the QA INFO documents (1, 2, 3, and 4) is to ensure quality and consistency in the development, delivery, and maintenance of academic programs and student support materials at MI Swiss. These documents collectively cover the guidelines for marketing and publicity materials (INFO1), the production and update of student handbooks (INFO2), the detailed structuring of program specifications (INFO3), and the creation, approval, and revision of module learning materials (INFO4). Each document plays a crucial role in maintaining high academic and operational standards, enhancing student learning experiences, and ensuring compliance with educational best practices.

1. The "QA INFO1 - Marketing and publicity approval guidelines" document: outlines the procedures and expectations for creating marketing and publicity materials at MI Swiss. It ensures that all materials accurately represent the institute's brand and offerings, are clear, current, and reflect the learning opportunities accurately. The guidelines cover various types of materials, including prospectuses, websites, and social media content, and detail the approval process to ensure compliance with these standards.

2. The "QA INFO2 - Procedure for the Production, Publication, and Amendment of Student Handbooks" document: details the process for creating, updating, and maintaining student handbooks at MI Swiss. It emphasizes the importance of keeping handbooks accurate and up-to-date, outlining the roles of the Quality Manager, Quality Coordinator (s), and the CEO cum Quality Manager in the update, approval, and publication processes. This procedure ensures that student handbooks reflect current policies, regulations, and program information, facilitating clear communication and guidance for students.

3.The "QA INFO3 - Programme Specification Form" document: is a comprehensive template for outlining the academic and operational details of a new or existing program. It includes sections for qualification objectives, quality standards, regulatory information, structure, entry requirements, and assessment methods. This form ensures that all programs are designed with clear objectives, meet regulatory and quality standards, and provide detailed information on delivery, assessment, and outcomes, facilitating a structured approach to program development and review.

4. The "QA INFO4 - Procedure for the Production, Approval, and Maintenance of Hybrid Module Learning Material": outlines the standards and processes for creating online learning materials at SIMI. It emphasizes content appropriateness, engagement, and compliance with educational standards and house style. The document details collaboration between writers, module leaders, and reviewers to ensure content meets academic requirements and enhances student learning. It also addresses the revision process, ensuring materials remain current and effective over time.

The overall intent of the RECRUITMENT AND ENROLMENT OF STUDENTS_ QA RECRUIT CODE documents is to outline and ensure the integrity and consistency of MI Swiss's student recruitment, admission, and enrolment processes. This includes the formal admission criteria and process (RECRUIT 1), recognizing and crediting prior learning (RECRUIT 2), setting clear terms and conditions for sale programs (REF 1), addressing admissions for students with criminal convictions (REF 2), and assessing admissions for these cases (REF 3). Collectively, these documents aim to establish transparent, fair, and inclusive practices that uphold the institution's standards and support student success from initial contact through to enrolment.

1. The "QA RECRUIT 1 – Admission of Students": document details MI Swiss's admissions policy, emphasizing inclusivity and alignment with its mission to offer flexible Swiss programs globally. It covers the policy's foundation on equality of opportunity, entrance requirements for various programs, the monitoring and annual review of admissions practices, and the treatment of applicants with disabilities or specific educational needs. It also addresses admissions with credit through accreditation of prior learning, English language requirements, and the provision of information and advice to applicants, ensuring a fair, transparent, and consistent admissions process.

2. The "QA RECRUIT 2 – Accreditation of Prior Learning Policy and Procedures": outlines the process by which students can receive formal recognition for prior learning, contributing towards exemptions from certain modules of their program. It emphasizes that such accreditation is subject to specific criteria and limitations, ensuring that students still meet the essential learning outcomes of their program. This policy facilitates the acknowledgment of relevant, previously acquired knowledge and skills, streamlining the educational pathway for students while maintaining academic standards.

3. The "QA RECRUIT REF 1 Terms and Conditions for Sale Programs": document outlines the terms and conditions that apply to students who accept an offer for distance or blended learning programs from MI Swiss. It highlights the institute's policies on program structure changes, fee adjustments, termination of the contract, personal data processing, copyright ownership of student work, and complaint procedures. This ensures clarity and mutual understanding between the institution and the students regarding their rights, responsibilities, and the legal framework governing their educational engagement.

4. The "QA RECRUIT REF 2 – Admission of Students who have a Criminal Conviction" : outlines the principles and procedures for admitting applicants with criminal convictions at MI Swiss. It emphasizes that having a conviction does not automatically exclude applicants but requires a detailed review to ensure no risk to the community, program integrity, or the institution's reputation. The document details the process for assessing such applications, including the potential need for additional disclosures and a thorough review by the admissions team and, if necessary, the Senior Admissions Committee, ensuring fair and comprehensive consideration.

5. The "QA RECRUIT REF 3 – Admission of Students who have a Criminal Conviction – Risk Assessment": provides a structured approach to evaluate the risk associated with admitting applicants with criminal convictions. It outlines the criteria for assessing potential risks to the community, program integrity, and the institution's reputation. This document details the process for conducting a risk assessment, including the evaluation of the conviction's relevance and the formulation of recommendations for admission or rejection based on the assessment outcomes.

The Learning and Teaching Committee (LTC) Documents encompass a set of guidelines, policies, and procedures established by MI Swiss to ensure the quality and effectiveness of learning and teaching practices within the institution. These documents are designed to provide clear direction, standards, and support for faculty, staff, and administrators involved in delivering academic programs and supporting student learning experiences. The LTC Documents cover a wide range of areas related to curriculum development, assessment practices, student support, and quality assurance, aiming to uphold academic standards, promote innovation, and foster continuous improvement in teaching and learning. Key aspects addressed in these documents include:

1. Curriculum Development: Guidelines and procedures for designing, reviewing, and updating academic programs and courses to ensure alignment with educational objectives, industry standards, and regulatory requirements.

2. Assessment Practices: Policies and protocols for assessing student learning outcomes, including guidelines for designing assessments, ensuring fairness and reliability, and providing feedback to students to support their academic progress.

3. Student Support: Resources and procedures for providing comprehensive support services to students, including academic advising, counseling, accessibility services, and support for student well-being and success.

4. Quality Assurance: Mechanisms for monitoring, evaluating, and improving the quality of teaching and learning activities, including processes for internal and external review, accreditation, and continuous enhancement of academic programs.

5. Professional Development: Opportunities and requirements for faculty and staff to engage in ongoing professional development activities to enhance their teaching skills, stay current with educational trends, and contribute to institutional goals.

The Research Committee Documents from MI Swiss include:

1. Ethics Policy (RC_01): This document outlines the ethical approval policy for research projects, classifying them by risk and detailing the approval process, emphasizing the importance of ethical considerations in research.

2. Student Research Proposal Form (RC_02): A form for students to propose their research projects, ensuring they align with ethical standards. It covers project details, objectives, methodology, timeline, and an ethics checklist.

3. Guidelines for Completing the Student Research Proposal Form (RC_03): Offers detailed instructions for completing the proposal form, including examples and explanations of the approval process based on ethical risk assessment.

Together, these documents form a comprehensive framework designed to uphold ethical standards in research conducted under the institute's auspices, guiding students through the proposal and approval process.

The "ASSESSMENT (QA Assessment Code)" series at the Online University of France encompasses a comprehensive set of documents and guidelines meticulously designed to support and enhance the assessment processes and procedures within the institution. This series includes:

1. Student Disciplinary Procedure:
   Outlines the steps for addressing student misconduct, ensuring fair and transparent processes.

2. Examination Regulations:
   Details the conduct expected of candidates during examinations, including the roles of invigilators and examination officers.

3. Approval of Examination Centres:
   Describes the criteria and process for approving new examination centers.

4. Exceptional Mitigating Circumstances Affecting Student Assessment:
   Provides guidelines for considering circumstances that may impact a student's assessment performance.

5. Unfair Practice in Assessment:
   Addresses the identification and handling of unfair practices in assessments.

6. Guidelines for Moderators:
   Offers directives for moderators overseeing the assessment process.

7. Policy on Internal Moderation:
   Establishes the framework for internal moderation of assessments to ensure consistency and fairness.

8. External Examiner Handbook:
   A comprehensive guide for external examiners on their roles and responsibilities.

9. Nomination and Appointment of External Examiners:
   Details the process for nominating and appointing external examiners.

10. External Examiner Report Form:
    A standardized form for external examiners to report on the assessments they oversee.

11. Academic Appeals Process:
    Outlines the procedure for students to appeal academic decisions.

12. External Examiner Nomination Form:
    A form used for nominating external examiners.

13. Announcement at Start of Examination:
    Contains the announcement to be read at the start of an examination.

14. Examination Candidates Attendance Register:
    Ensures accurate tracking of student attendance during examinations.

15. Examination Officer and Invigilators Details:
    Lists roles and contact information for staff overseeing exams.

16. Examination Invigilators Report:
    A report form for invigilators to document examination conduct and incidents.

17. Examination Script Front Sheet:
    A cover sheet for examination scripts, detailing candidate and examination information.

18. Written Feedback Policy:
    Outlines the policy for providing written feedback on assessments to students.

19. Assessment Brief Template Level 6:
    A template for creating assessment briefs for Level 6 qualifications.

20. Internal Assessment Approval Form:
    A form used for the internal approval of assessments.

21. Word Count Policy - Undergraduate:
    Details the word count policy for undergraduate assessments.

22. Word Count Policy - Postgraduate:
    Specifies the word count policy for postgraduate assessments.

23. Dissertations Marking Guidelines:
    Provides guidelines for marking dissertations, ensuring consistency and fairness.

This QA ASSESSMENT CODE series establishes a structured and rigorous framework for conducting assessments at the Online University of France, ensuring consistency, fairness, and transparency in all assessment-related processes.

The Procedure of Academic Partnership (AP) at the Online University of France encompasses a comprehensive approach to establishing, monitoring, and managing collaborations between the institution and various academic entities. This includes the rigorous evaluation and approval of representatives, academic delivery partners, agents, and study centers. The process ensures that partnerships align with the university's standards for quality, legal compliance, financial stability, and educational excellence. Through detailed procedures and checklists, the university aims to maintain high academic standards and enhance student experiences while fostering productive and sustainable academic relationships.

Key Aspects of the Procedure:

1. Representative Approval Procedures:
   Establishes a comprehensive process for approving and managing representatives and progression agreements, ensuring alignment with quality and regulatory standards.

2. Academic Delivery Partner Approval, Monitoring, and Management Procedures:
   Outlines the process for the approval and continuous monitoring of academic delivery partners, highlighting the importance of maintaining academic standards and student experience.

3. Agent Due Diligence Checklist:
   Provides a thorough checklist for evaluating potential agents, focusing on legal, financial, operational, and educational quality standards.

4. Study Centre Approval Procedures:
   Describes the process for approving study centers, from initial appraisal through to ongoing monitoring, ensuring compliance with health, safety, and educational quality requirements.

These procedures collectively ensure that the Online University of France maintains high standards in its collaborations, safeguarding the quality of education and the integrity of its academic partnerships.

The Programme Specifications (PS Code) refer to detailed documents that outline the aims, learning outcomes, structure, and assessment methods of each academic program offered by the Online University of France. These specifications serve as a blueprint for both teaching staff and students, ensuring clarity on what is expected throughout the course of study. They play a crucial role in maintaining academic standards and aligning the curriculum with the institution's educational objectives, accreditation requirements, and industry expectations, thereby facilitating a structured and comprehensive educational experience.

These documents cover all the programs carried out by the Online University of France itself and also by its academic partners, ensuring a consistent and aligned approach to program delivery and quality.

Health and safety regulations are a set of rules and guidelines designed to prevent accidents and injuries in workplaces and public areas. They ensure a safe and healthy environment for employees, students, and the general public by addressing risks and implementing measures to mitigate them. These regulations cover a broad range of topics, including workplace safety, emergency procedures, equipment and facilities maintenance, and the management of hazardous substances. Compliance with these regulations is mandatory, and they are enforced by relevant authorities to protect well-being and promote a culture of safety.

Key Health and Safety Documents:

1. HS 1 Health and Safety Policy:
   This document outlines the Online University of France's comprehensive approach to ensuring the health, safety, and well-being of its staff, students, and others affected by its activities. It emphasizes the importance of adhering to local and national health and safety laws, detailing the institution's commitment, organizational responsibilities, and specific procedures for managing and mitigating risks. The policy covers various areas, including emergency procedures, risk assessments, and incident management, aiming to create a safe and healthy environment for all.

2. HS 2 Student Health and Safety Policy:
   This document elaborates on the institution's commitment to safeguarding the health and safety of all stakeholders, with a particular focus on students in both blended learning and distance learning environments. It specifies the responsibilities of health and safety representatives at study centers, outlines the obligations of students to manage risks and report incidents, and emphasizes the inclusion of health and safety guidance in student inductions and handbooks. The policy also addresses the specific needs of disabled students through Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) and provides advice for distance learning students on creating a safe study environment.

These health and safety regulations and policies are integral to fostering a secure and supportive educational environment at the Online University of France.

The SS series documents encompass a wide range of student-related policies and procedures, ensuring a comprehensive and supportive educational environment. From SS1, which establishes a learning contract between students and the institution, to SS10, underscoring the importance of academic freedom, each document plays a vital role in shaping a positive and conducive learning experience.

• SS2 focuses on monitoring and support for online programs.
• SS3 details the complaints procedure.
• SS4 and SS5 address safeguarding and student conduct, respectively.
• SS6 and SS7 differentiate refund policies for EU and non-EU residents.
• SS8 covers withdrawals for non-academic reasons.
• Finally, SS9 and SS10 emphasize freedom of speech and academic freedom, ensuring a respectful and open academic dialogue.

Titles of the SS Documents:

1. SS1: Student Learning Contract
   Establishes expectations and responsibilities for both students and the institution.

2. SS2: Student Monitoring and Support Procedure for Online Programmes
   Details the processes for providing support and monitoring student progress in online programs.

3. SS3: Student Complaints Procedure
   Outlines the procedure for students to raise complaints and seek resolution.

4. SS4: Safeguarding Policy Statement
   Provides guidelines to ensure the safety and well-being of students.

5. SS5: Student Code of Conduct
   Sets forth expectations for student behavior and conduct.

6. SS6: Refund Policy for EU Residents
   Details the refund process and conditions applicable to EU students.

7. SS7: Refund Policy for Non-EU Residents
   Specifies the refund policy for students from outside the EU.

8. SS8: Withdrawals for Non-Academic Reasons
   Outlines the procedure for students to withdraw for non-academic reasons.

9. SS9: Freedom of Speech Code of Practice
   Promotes the principle of freedom of speech within the academic community.

10. SS10: Academic Freedom Policy
    Emphasizes the importance of academic freedom for students and faculty.

11. SS11: Acceptable Use Policy
    Establishes guidelines for the acceptable use of university resources and facilities.

These SS series documents collectively ensure that the Online University of France maintains a supportive, fair, and inclusive learning environment for all students.